Answer :
Final answer:
PAC funding in elections generally favors incumbents due to their established track records and connections. While some challengers receive support, the tendency leans towards incumbents as they are perceived to have a higher chance of winning. Thus, the correct answer is "mostly incumbents, but some challengers."
Explanation:
Understanding PAC Funding in Elections
Political Action Committees, or PACs, are organizations that collect and distribute contributions to candidates running for office. In the context of elections, PAC funding tends to favor incumbents more than challengers. This is primarily because incumbents often have a track record, existing relationships, and name recognition that make them more appealing to PACs looking to support candidates with a higher likelihood of winning.
Reasons PACs Favor Incumbents
- Established Relationships: Incumbents typically have previously held office and have developed connections, making PACs more willing to support them.
- Proven Track Records: Incumbents can showcase their prior achievements, appealing to PACs that prefer to invest in candidates with a history of success.
- Higher Winning Chances: Support from PACs is often motivated by the perceived potential for electoral success, which favors incumbents.
In contrast, while some PAC support may go to challengers, it is less frequent. Therefore, the correct answer to how PAC funding shapes electoral outcomes is that it tends to favor mostly incumbents, but some challengers.
Learn more about PAC Funding here:
https://brainly.com/question/36610026