Which of the following statements about campaign spending is true?

A. Incumbents generally spend less money than challengers.

B. Incumbents and challengers generally spend the same amount of money.

C. Incumbents generally spend more money than challengers.

D. Incumbents and challengers are legally limited to spending only $2 million.

Incumbents generally outspend challengers due to their established recognition and support from donors. In recent elections, incumbents raised significantly more funds than their challengers. This financial advantage contributes to the high rate of incumbents winning reelection.

Explanation:

Understanding Campaign Spending

Among the statements provided regarding campaign spending, the most accurate is that incumbents generally spend more money than challengers. The financial advantage of incumbents can be attributed to several factors:

Incumbents have established their name recognition, allowing them to attract more donations.
Political Action Committees and wealthy individuals prefer to invest in candidates they believe have a higher chance of winning, which often favors incumbents.
Data shows that incumbents raised significantly more than their challengers in elections; for example, in 2020, the average Senate incumbent raised [tex]$28,649,593, while challengers raised average of $[/tex]5,264,022.

Challengers, even with significant spending, face an uphill battle given these numerical advantages. As a result, due to these dynamics, incumbents not only spend more but also tend to win reelection consistently.

Learn more about Campaign Spending here:

https://brainly.com/question/42907384