Answer :
Final answer:
The Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ) has job incumbents evaluate over 180 generalized worker behaviors, whereas the Fleishman Job Analysis System (F-JAS) asks job incumbents to evaluate the usefulness of over 50 abilities.
Explanation:
Job analysis, facilitated by tools like the Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ) and the Fleishman Job Analysis System (F-JAS), is pivotal for comprehending the intricacies of different job roles. The PAQ involves a comprehensive assessment of over 180 generalized worker behaviors, while the F-JAS focuses on evaluating the usefulness of more than 50 abilities required for specific jobs. These methods contribute to both task-oriented and worker-oriented job analyses. Task-oriented analyses delineate the specific tasks and their frequencies within a job role, while worker-oriented analyses delve into the knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) necessary for effective job performance.
Accurate job analysis facilitates informed decisions in employee selection, job design, and performance prediction. Understanding the nuances of job requirements enables organizations to match candidates with suitable roles, design job structures conducive to productivity and satisfaction, and anticipate the performance capabilities of employees within various job contexts. Thus, job analysis serves as a cornerstone for effective human resource management and organizational development strategies.