Answer :
Final answer:
Interest groups typically prefer to support incumbents over new candidates because of the former's electoral advantages, making them more likely to win and thus provide access. There are exceptions depending on the challenger's alignment with the group's views or the incumbent's vulnerability.
Explanation:
The question of whether interest groups tend to support new candidates over incumbents is answered by understanding their strategic approach to political contributions. Generally, the answer is false; interest groups more frequently support incumbents. Incumbents offer these groups several advantages, including higher name recognition, more significant experience, and better fundraising capabilities. These advantages make incumbents more likely to win, making them attractive for interest groups seeking to have access to lawmakers. However, there are exceptions where interest groups may support challengers, especially if those challengers align more closely with the interest group's views or if the incumbent seems particularly vulnerable. It's also not uncommon for some interest groups to hedge their bets by contributing to both candidates in a major two-party race to ensure access regardless of the election outcome.